Stability Nexus
  • About Us
    • Stability Nexus
    • The Djed Alliance
    • The Stable Order
      • The Meaning of Order
      • Code of Honor
        • The Task Assignment Corollary: a Guideline
        • What does it mean to be Non-Rent-Seeking?
        • Algorithmic Decentralization
      • Knights and Benefactors
        • Top Benefactors
      • Evangelists
      • Grantors, Sponsors and Donors
        • Top Grantors, Sponsors and Donors
      • CATs
        • Our CATs
        • Swapping CATs
      • Djed, the Djed Alliance and The Stable Order
      • Join The Stable Order
        • Apprenticeship
        • Would you like a job?
        • Are you a marketing agency interested in promoting our work?
    • Our History
    • Fund Us
      • Funded Projects
  • Stablecoins
    • What are stablecoins? Why are they important?
    • Types of Stablecoins
    • What kind of asset is being issued?
  • Stability Research Network
    • Study Reports
    • Technical Papers
    • Presentations
  • Djed Stablecoin Protocols
    • Djed Overview
    • How the Protocol Works
    • Who is the issuer?
    • Versions
    • Implementations
    • Deployments
    • Why Djed on your Blockchain?
    • Why Djed for your Web3 Project?
    • Create a Djed-based Stablecoin
  • Gluon Protocols
    • Gluon Overview
    • Deployments
  • Stable Funding
    • FairFund Overview
    • FairFund User Guide
    • FairFund Implementations
  • Infra-Structure
    • DJED1 Cardano StakePool
  • Other
    • Disclaimer
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

Edit on GitHub
  1. About Us
  2. The Stable Order
  3. Code of Honor

Algorithmic Decentralization

There are two ways of decentralizing control away from a single entity:

  • Governance-Based Decentralization: replace the single entity by multiple entities that govern together;

  • Algorithmic Decentralization: replace the single entity by an algorithm, thus having zero entities with governing power.

Algorithmic decentralization is superior for many reasons, such as the following:

  • There is no guarantee that a set of multiple entities will not misbehave in the same way that a single entity could. In fact, if the incentives for misbehavior remain the same, it is quite possible that the multiples entities will collude to misbehave. An algorithm, on the other hand is bound to execute according to its rules.

  • Depending on how the multiple entities depend on each other, a governance-based decentralized system may be less resilient than a centralized one, because the failure or misbehavior of just one of the multiple entities may suffice to break the system.

  • There are many theoretical results showing that it is impossible to have perfect voting or preference aggregation procedures. Most procedures are, in fact, quite flawed and do not generate outcomes that correctly reflect the wishes of the whole group.

  • Truth is not a matter of opinion. It is better to rely on algorithms that provably or empirically achieve the desired outcome than to be subject to the opinions of others regarding what might or might not achieve the desired outcome.

  • Governance-based decentralization tends to be costly and slow.

  • Governance-based decentralization remains vulnerable to rent-seeking behaviour.

For all such reasons, The Stable Order strongly prefers algorithmic decentralization, both in our protocols and in our own organization.

PreviousWhat does it mean to be Non-Rent-Seeking?NextKnights and Benefactors

Last updated 10 months ago

Was this helpful?